A Description of the Bar-and-Frame-Hive With an Abstract of Wildman's Complete Guide for the Management of Bees Throughout the Year — A Closer Reading
Edition facts
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
W. Augustus Munn's 1844 pamphlet presents his bar-and-frame-hive as a deliberate improvement over common hives, supported by a detailed plate description that itemizes every component—from the oblong box and gable ends to the perforated zinc ventilator and the observation-frame's back bolt. The work is explicitly a response to repeated requests for explanation, and Munn frames it as a practical guide rather than a natural history treatise.
The text is structured in two distinct parts: Munn's own description of the hive and its advantages, followed by an abstract of Wildman's bee-management book. This dual structure means the reader encounters both original design specifications and inherited practical wisdom, sometimes in the same paragraph.
Hive Construction and the Role of the Plate
The opening pages are dominated by a meticulous explanation of Plate I, Figure 1. Munn labels every part of the hive with letters and coordinates—A B C D E F for the oblong box, Q Q for the quadrants supporting the table, and a a a for fifteen holes receiving the back bolt of the observation-frame. The description is so granular that it reads like a set of assembly instructions, yet it is embedded in a continuous prose paragraph rather than a numbered list.
This level of detail suggests that the plate itself was essential to the pamphlet's purpose. Munn assumes his reader has the illustration at hand and refers to it constantly. The text does not explain why each part works; it simply names and locates it. For a modern reader, the plate becomes a necessary companion, and the pamphlet's value lies partly in how it documents a specific material object from mid-19th-century beekeeping.
Wildman's Instructions on Honey and Wax
The abstract of Wildman's guide occupies a substantial portion of the pamphlet and is presented as direct quotation. Wildman's voice is markedly different from Munn's: it is prescriptive and procedural, with detailed steps for separating honey from wax. He instructs the reader to work in a warm, closed room to prevent bees from entering, and to set aside combs containing brood because they would give the honey a bad flavour.
Wildman also distinguishes between grades of honey. The finest is obtained by draining combs without pressing, while the remainder is squeezed and reserved for feeding bees. The wax is purified through repeated boiling and pressing. These instructions reveal a practical economy where nothing is wasted, and they implicitly acknowledge that honey quality varies by source—heather honey and labiate plants are praised, while the rhododendron ponticum is noted as potentially harmful, though not yet a problem in England.
Protective Gear and the Gendered Division of Labour
A striking passage in Wildman's abstract addresses the dangers of extracting honey. He recommends buckskin gloves covered with worsted gloves extending to the elbows, and a wire gauze net for the face. Then he adds: "The only protection necessary for gentlemen,—for ladies, I presume, would never venture to undertake the dangerous task of extracting the honey combs from hives or boxes."
This remark, though brief, reveals an assumed gender division in beekeeping practice. The pamphlet does not challenge or explain this assumption; it simply records it as a matter of course. The passage also underscores the physical risk involved in the work, which the detailed protective measures are meant to mitigate. Together with the precise hive design, these practical concerns ground the pamphlet in the realities of 19th-century apiculture rather than in abstract natural history.
Readers approaching this pamphlet should be prepared for a hybrid text: part inventor's specification, part compiled manual. The bar-and-frame-hive itself is never fully evaluated in the excerpts—Munn asserts its advantages but does not provide comparative data. The value of the work today lies less in its beekeeping advice (much of which has been superseded) and more in its documentation of a specific moment when hive design was becoming more systematic, and when the craft of beekeeping was beginning to be written down in explicit, illustrated form.
Your personal reading reflection
Build a private reading journal entry for this title.